![]() Under CDAP, companies would be required to publish clear privacy policies covering the collection, use, and sharing of personal data, including details of the purpose for which data is being collected, the data retention period, and they would also need to include a description of the company’s security practices.ĬDAP allows consumers to see what data is held on them by a company and find out with whom their data has been shared. It also goes into greater detail on the protections that must be in place to protect consumers. Wicker’s CDAP goes further than CCPA as it will apply to a much broader range of companies. CCPA will, however, only apply to certain companies – Those with revenues in excess of $25 million as well as any company, any company that holds the data of 50,000 or more individuals, and companies that collect more than half of their revenues from the sale of personal data. It also includes a private cause of action, so consumers are permitted to sue companies that are in breach of the CCPA. Similar to GDPR, CCPA allows consumers to see what data is held on them by a company and find out with whom their data has been shared. If the bill becomes law it will override state privacy laws, including the California Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA) that is due to take effect on January 1, 2020.ĬCPA gives California residents new privacy rights and has been likened to the General Data Protection Regulation in the EU, albeit with fewer security requirements for companies. citizens receive the same rights and privacy protections regardless of where they live. Senator Roger Wicker (R-Miss), Chair of the Commerce Committee, has released a draft copy of the United States Consumer Data Privacy Act of 2019 (CDAP), a federal data privacy bill that is intended to replace the patchwork of state privacy laws in the United States. So far, there is no companion measure in the U.S. Senate Appropriations Committee last week. Roger Wicker, R-Miss., is also co-sponsoring the bill. This good bill will ensure the federal government can uphold its obligation to quickly deploy emergency funding and resources to communities and Americans impacted by natural disasters,” said Scott. “Floridians know that responding to natural disasters is a team effort, which requires every level of government to be ready to assist families in need at a moment’s notice. It’s time for Congress to act and provide FEMA with the funding they need for disaster relief,” said Rubio. Our communities deserve better than this. “Congress cannot allow the Biden administration to use disaster funding as a bargaining chip, doing so puts countless vulnerable communities at risk. Rubio mirrored that line of attack at the end of last week. ![]() “If Congress doesn’t act to prevent a shortfall in the DRF, there will be no funds for unforeseen major disasters until the end of the fiscal year.” The Biden administration has failed to take the necessary steps to ensure that the federal government is prepared to respond to natural disasters in a timely and effective manner,” Rubio’s office noted. The DRF is expected to run out of funds during the first week of August, in the middle of the 2023 hurricane season. “The Federal Emergency Management Agency’s (FEMA) Disaster Relief Fund (DRF) responds to major disasters through assistance to individuals, households, and non-federal government entities. Rubio’s office pointed the blame for the problem at the Biden administration. The bill ensures theFederal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) “has sufficient resources to continue ongoing disaster response and is prepared for unforeseen major disasters such as hurricanes, wildfires, and other events.” Rick Scott, R-Fla., as one of the two co-sponsors. Marco Rubio, R-Fla., introduced the “ Disaster Relief Fund Replenishment Act” with U.S.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |